Research group guide

Bronte-Stewart Lab

Helen Bronte-Stewart

Human Motor Control and Neuromodulation Laboratory: linking quantitative movement measurements with implanted subthalamic local field potentials and neuromodulation to understand Parkinson’s disease and develop personalized adaptive therapies.

Official research website ↗

Independent educational resource. Not affiliated with or endorsed by this university or laboratory.

Questions behind the work

Research questions

01

Which neural signals track impaired movement in Parkinson’s disease?

02

How do beta dynamics relate to bradykinesia, gait and freezing?

03

Can brain and movement biomarkers drive adaptive deep brain stimulation?

04

Can machine-learning models decode motor state well enough to personalize neuromodulation?

Your recommended path

Learn this research

Research primer

Decoding and Restoring Movement in Parkinson’s Disease

5 lessons · ~27 minutes

An independent primer on Parkinson’s disease, quantitative movement analysis, subthalamic neural signals, beta oscillations, deep brain stimulation, adaptive DBS, gait decoding, and personalized neuromodulation, designed around research themes relevant to the Bronte-Stewart Lab.

Watch videos
  1. 01Parkinson’s disease: why does movement become difficult?
  2. 02How do you measure Parkinson’s movement and brain activity?
  3. 03Beta oscillations: a neural signature of impaired movement
  4. 04From continuous DBS to a brain pacemaker that adapts
  5. 05AI, gait, and the future of personalized neuromodulation

Key concepts

Beta desynchronization, coherence, and motor impairment

Compare pre-movement beta desynchronization with interhemispheric coherence without inferring causation.

Beta oscillations and beta bursts

Distinguish beta power from threshold-defined burst duration.

Bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, gait impairment, and freezing

Distinguish bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor and involuntary freezing of gait.

Deep brain stimulation and circuit modulation

Describe DBS as circuit modulation for selected patients, rather than a cure.

Local field potentials and synchronized brain–behavior recording

Distinguish a local population LFP from single-neuron spikes and explain synchronized brain–behavior recording.

Machine-learning decoding and personalized neuromodulation

Explain per-person N2GNet prediction, independent testing and the limits of personalized neuromodulation evidence.

Neural and kinematic biomarkers for gait

Interpret neural and wearable gait biomarkers within their measurement limits.

Open-loop versus adaptive closed-loop DBS

Compare open-loop and adaptive feedback while interpreting the seven-person gait study conservatively.

Parkinson’s disease and basal-ganglia motor dysfunction

Explain how dopamine loss disrupts distributed motor circuits without reducing Parkinson’s to dopamine alone.

Quantitative kinematics and movement measurement

Explain what continuous kinematic measurements add to observation.

Important papers

Brain Commun 7(4):fcaf266 · 2025

Beta burst-driven adaptive deep brain stimulation for gait impairment and freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease

Wilkins KB, Petrucci MN, Lambert EF, Melbourne JA, Gala AS, Akella P, Parisi L, Cui C, Kehnemouyi YM, Hoffman SL, Aditham S, Diep C, Dorris HJ, Parker JE, Herron JA, Bronte-Stewart HM

Why this matters: Seven-participant investigational beta-burst-driven adaptive DBS study. Gait/freezing improved relative to stimulation OFF; group outcomes were comparable to continuous and random-adaptive stimulation, without universal superiority.

DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf266

Ann Neurol 93(5):1029–1039 · 2023

Bradykinesia and its progression are related to inter-hemispheric beta coherence

Wilkins KB, Kehnemouyi YM, Petrucci MN, Anderson RW, Parker JE, Trager MH, et al., Bronte-Stewart HM

Why this matters: Links bradykinesia and its progression with interhemispheric beta coherence over longitudinal observation. Coherence between signals differs from the power of a single signal; association is not causation.

DOI: 10.1002/ana.26605

Brain Stimul 19(1):103028 (letter / case report) · 2026

At home monitoring of chronic adaptive deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease

Cui C, Choi JW, Karjagi S, Wilkins KB, Negi A, Bronte-Stewart HM

Why this matters: One-person at-home case report compares four-week adaptive and continuous DBS periods with neural sensing and daily digitography. Feasibility and individual patterns cannot establish population-level superiority.

DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2026.103028

J Parkinsons Dis 12(6):1979–1990 · 2022

Quantitative digitography measures motor symptoms and disease progression in Parkinson's disease

Wilkins KB, Petrucci MN, Kehnemouyi Y, Velisar A, Han K, Orthlieb G, Trager MH, O'Day JJ, Aditham S, Bronte-Stewart H

Why this matters: Quantitative digitography measured tapping timing, amplitude and rhythm in 96 people with Parkinson’s and 42 controls. Instrumented measurements complement clinical ratings without replacing them.

DOI: 10.3233/JPD-223264

Independent project ideas inspired by this research

Projects you could do

Educational ideas using public or synthetic data. These projects are not offered or supervised by the lab or research group.

Introductory

Detect candidate freezing events from wearable IMU data

Computational / machine learning and signal processing

Compare a threshold baseline and a classifier on public or synthetic gait signals. Separate people between training and testing and report errors around turning.

Background
Gait, IMUs, Model evaluation
Data
Synthetic IMU traces, or a publicly licensed gait dataset with documented consent and de-identification. No private clinical recordings.
Output
Reproducible notebook, plots and a short claim-evidence report

Independent educational idea, not offered or supervised by the lab. Public or synthetic data only; no human-subject, animal or clinical intervention. Simulated controllers must never be used on a person or stimulation device.

Introductory

Detect beta bursts in simulated neural recordings

Simulation / neural signal analysis

Generate a declared beta-band signal with known transient bursts. Test how filtering and threshold choices change estimated burst duration.

Background
Beta oscillations, Python
Data
Synthetic 13–30 Hz signals with an explicit burst-duration ground truth.
Output
Reproducible notebook, plots and a short claim-evidence report

Independent educational idea, not offered or supervised by the lab. Public or synthetic data only; no human-subject, animal or clinical intervention. Simulated controllers must never be used on a person or stimulation device.

Introductory

Compare power, burst duration and coherence

Computational neuroscience / literature-data synthesis

Simulate pairs of signals where average power stays fixed but bursts or intersignal coherence change. Compare distinct measurements with an evidence table from cited papers.

Background
Beta bursts, Statistics
Data
Synthetic signal pairs and publicly reported summary values from the cited beta studies.
Output
Reproducible notebook, plots and a short claim-evidence report

Independent educational idea, not offered or supervised by the lab. Public or synthetic data only; no human-subject, animal or clinical intervention. Simulated controllers must never be used on a person or stimulation device.

Introductory

Simulate open-loop and feedback stimulation

Simulation / control systems modeling

Compare a fixed controller with a bounded feedback policy in a toy noisy motor-state model. Report delay sensitivity and failure modes without making clinical predictions.

Background
Adaptive DBS, Python
Data
A synthetic plant model with explicitly hypothetical parameters; no device connection.
Output
Reproducible notebook, plots and a short claim-evidence report

Independent educational idea, not offered or supervised by the lab. Public or synthetic data only; no human-subject, animal or clinical intervention. Simulated controllers must never be used on a person or stimulation device.

Introductory

Quantify finger-tapping variability

Computational / kinematics and statistics

Analyze synthetic alternating-key timing and amplitude traces. Compare mean speed with rhythm variability and show how measurement noise changes conclusions.

Background
Quantitative digitography, Statistics
Data
Synthetic finger-tapping traces; reported QDG summary values for context only.
Output
Reproducible notebook, plots and a short claim-evidence report

Independent educational idea, not offered or supervised by the lab. Public or synthetic data only; no human-subject, animal or clinical intervention. Simulated controllers must never be used on a person or stimulation device.

Related labs and groups

Ranked by shared research topics in the current collection.

University of California, Berkeley

Robotic AI & Learning Lab

Sergey Levine

Berkeley RAIL research studies robot learning from demonstrations, reward, prior datasets, and interaction: policies, reinforcement learning, manipulation, and generalization. The independent Levine primer also covers his co-founder work at Physical Intelligence, a separate company.

Shared topics: Machine learning, Neural network models

7 lessons · ~37 minutes

Explore the lab